Thought I'd dig this out of the 'comments' section, and throw it up for some perusal. There have been two horrible decisions in post-war america relating to the role of the private sector in the health and well being of Americans. The first is the decision to have company-sponsored, rather than state-sponsored, pensions. The second is also having companies be responsible for health care. Yes, there is the argument that well insured workers are happier and more productive workers, and so it's in globalcom's best interest to insure its workesrs to the hilt blah, blah, blah ,but I'm not entirely sold on that little argument. Because, obviously, it's not working. Companies have shown that they will cut healthcare/stop subsidizing so much of it in order to maintain profit levels. This is why unless you work in a 'professional' industry, your odds of a decent health care program are not good.
And while Mr. Kyle is clearly a raging commie bastard, I do agree that it would be pretty hard to fuck up the health care situation in the U.S. anymore. Or the pension system, while we're at it. Dude. You should all retire in switzerland. it's MONAAAAYYYY...MOONNNAAAAAYYYYY. I'd be rich, biatch!
_________________________________________________________________
so here it is:americans love to speak of "market demands" as some grand absolution for any changes that happen economically (and thus politically) in this country, as if we have ever had a "free market" (and not the government sponsored coporate structure that we actually have). anyone in business, large or small, will tell you that the biggest threat to growth in this country is health care. It increases at an exponential, unpredictable rate, strangling small and large business alike. Most corporations today seem to think that there is no conceivable way for them to offer large-scale health care to the majority of their workers in the forseeable future, and single-payer insurance remains prohibitavely expensive for nearly everyone.So what happens when "market forces" demand unviversal health care, administrated by the government, to relieve the burden of employer-governed health-care by business? Personally, I see this as the only possible outcome with the way things are happening in this country today.So, why not levy a per-person tax on all corporations, administrated by the government, which will provide healthcare to all workers in a corporation? This would be adjusted for interest for each year, maybe average increased every 5 to 10 years for increases in healthcare cost, but would provide a stable prediction for healthcare costs per year for each corporation based upon the number of employees. There would probably have to be a few percent tax also across all tax brackets, but in turn, all full-time employed citizens in this country would receive healthcare.The way I see it, this would do 2 things: 1) encourage people to get fucking JOBS, because they would have their health care taken care of, and 2) allow business to acurately predict budgets, knowing that their health care costs will not increase year to year because they are fixed. There would also have to be limits on malpractice payouts (which are out of fucking control anyway), and naturally, insurance companies and HMO's would be dead set against this. But fuck it, their time has come; administrative and waste costs in managed health care are LEGENDARY, and it would be difficult for the government to do a worse job in this respect. So that's a rough outline, tell me what you capatalist bastards think.....